Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


"Cooklang – Recipe Markup Language"

https://cooklang.org/

I love this but also think it'll never take off (but should)

#cooking #recipe #programming
A screenshot of cooklang, where ingredients are prefixed with @ and suffixed with {}:

Then add @salt and @ground black pepper{} to taste. Poke holes in @potato{2}. Place @acon strips{1%kg} on a baking sheet and glaze with @syrup{1/2%tbsp}.
Did you check https://cooked.wiki/, yet? ;)
uhu... Seems like a useful use of llm-nlp. You use it?
No. But not because of the wiki, but because I don't cook.
It would need to prove itself a more accessible/beneficial workflow to the cookbook publishing industry and recipe bloggers, which is probably not outside the realm of possibility if some more GUIs and exporters were made to focus on non-technical users.
You may also enjoy https://schema.org/Recipe
May ought to be an emacs mode 😃
https://github.com/cooklang/cook-mode haha
NIH = not invented here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here

Yeah, I didn't see any project rational arguing why no other existing project is suitable... Indeed, one should always look for that. Writing XML is not a thrilling prospect though, gotta be honest.

I'm becoming more of a fan of volumes, for recipes which aren't variance critical. But get your point.
oh that is really cool, i thought it would just be a joke programming language but no it is literally a markup language for cooking recipes that's awesome on so many levels :blobfoxheartcute:
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (10 Monate her)
And here I was getting ready to move all my recipes into Gemtext for my Gemini capsule.
write a thing for cooklang to create Gemtext output?
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (10 Monate her)

Doug Webb hat dies geteilt

Hm.. If I mention @potatoes{1%kg} and @potatoes{500%g} will it add them, will it take the maximum value? Depending on the recipe either could be correct. In general this is a nice idea, but it doesn't seem thought through thoroughly.