Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen
#Ostrom and Crawford started the Institutional Analysis and Development framework, with its 3 levels and 7 rule categories.

Has anyone on fedi worked with it?

Concrete question: which category do conflict resolution processes best fit in? (I'm guessing Aggregation, but could be Boundary)

#commons #IAD
#commons #ostrom #iad
Aaron Wolf
Conflict resolution seems itself something to subject to such analysis rather than a *part* of it or fit *into* it.

I'm only superficially reviewing, but I see the IAD ideas as all describing features *of* conflict resolution potentially, just as they describe other things.

That said, I don't immediately find IAD useful or insightful particularly.

@douginamug @bhaugen @ntnsndr @marcusmeindel
@Doug Webb @bhaugen @Nathan Schneider @Marcus Meindel
Marcus Meindel
I like the IAD as it teached me a deeper understanding of social situation. But I'm unsure about its practical use - I hope there is one.

A conflict resolution process can be based on various rules of different kind. It can contain an aggrigation rule: "a decision is accepted when (x) persons say (y)". It can contain boundary rules: "After (y) is decided, the concerned person is excluded of position (z)"

@wolftune @douginamug @bhaugen @ntnsndr
@Doug Webb @bhaugen @Nathan Schneider @Aaron Wolf
Doug Webb
My reading of Ostrom and of subsequent researchers, is that the IAD was/is intended to provide a full categorization framework.

(See e.g. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2019697 where researchers apply IAD to FLOSS institutions)

I'm interested for any kind of usable ontology/categorization in relation to collectivegovernance.directory but more generally.

It just seems that conflict-resolution is quite distinct, and shouldn't have to be "squeezed" anywhere.

@bhaugen @ntnsndr

Applying Elinor Ostrom’s Rule Classification Framework to the Analysis of Open Source Software Commons

This research investigates the utility of Ostrom and Crawford’s rule classification framework (elaborated in Understanding Institutional Diversity) in the syste
papers.ssrn.com
@bhaugen @Nathan Schneider
Doug Webb
So I thought about this a bunch, and read more, and I'm 75% sure that conflict-resolution falls under Aggregation.

I plan to write up my notes when back at keyboard...
Marcus Meindel
.... but it is a process and the categorization is for single rules. A conflict resolution process is seldom (never?) a single rule.

But I can wait for notes ;)
⇧