Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


I like trams.

But ever since someone pointed out that tram-buses cost less to install, run, and don't require tracks, I can't help but think they're a better idea.

Usually when I've just swerved away from some tram tracks on my bike.
I assume they're just buses with pantographs?
Why are they cheaper to operate?
not sure... lower rolling resistance -> less electricity? Lower maintenance costs because we have more auto industries than tram?
An articulated bus is about 18 m long; the Seimens S70 (picking a tramcar from Wikipedia by chance) is 29.1 m long. So trams seem to be longer, and also the seating arrangements are different.

Couldn't you replace a tramcar by just running two buses, with most of their floor area for standing passengers?
@douginamug
Could you explain please? I don't understand this argument. If anything, don't buses stop over shorter distances than trams?

@douginamug
learning a lot on this thread!

Still, I think you (Nicolai) are a bit unfair on busses... ladies with hats & the prince of Wales can sure take busses. Many busses have lower steps than trams too.

Indeed, I'd rather eat into car space for bike lanes than removing tram lines.

It would be fine if bikes only had to cross tram tracks at 90 degree angles, but in #Leipzig there are a significant number of <45 and even some really slight ones.
ooooh! Any pics? Would be awesome