Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

NYC Mayor Eric Adams explains why he personally went to escort Luigi Mangione to court on Thursday.

#NYC #LuigiMangione #EricAdams #ACAB
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Luigi Mangione, the alleged CEO killer, was back in court Monday and entered a not guilty plea. His lawyer went off on the media circus intentionally created by Eric Adams(and other officials) inserting himself in this trial which unduly influences the pool of potential jurors. As well as the massive and unnecessary perp walk through tourist destinations around NYC.

#LuigiMangione #FreeLuigi #NYC

2 Personen haben dies geteilt

These goons towering over Luigi are not just fighting him, they are fighting ALL OF US.

Well, they can consider the fight joined. If a Trump Federal government executes Luigi sheer fucking hell is going to break loose. Trump will then be screaming about "anarchy in the streets," I can almost hear him now.

BTW, I was once called a terrorist from the bench, by a magistrate in a status hearing. This was after between 300 and 400 protesters stormed Nieman-Marcus one week after GW Bush's first Inauguration. That protest was over Nieman-Marcus selling fur, which at least half of GOP women at G.W. Bush, Jan 20, 2001 Inauguration were wearing.

As far as I am concerned, Luigi should be released without charges, and CEOs whose policy decisions have resulted in at least one provable death should be rounded up in his place.
Mangione wants to speak in court. At trial. That's incredibly dangerous and brave, no matter who you are.
It's even more dangerous if you do not work alone, as you can be asked ANY question in cross-examination and objections from your lawyer may not be upheld.

With a charge carrying a long prison sentence however, contempt of court may not be a charge worth worrying about. In that case you can take the stand and issue your to remind the jurors of their right of jury nullification in this case. Probably would take 2-3 rounds of deadlocked juries to force prosecutors to drop this case. An exception exists: if no "impartial" jury can be seated, the case cannot be heard. Combine a jury trial demand and a speedy trial demand and this can forcibly close the case.
yeah, we'll see
In state court Mangione's lawyer, Karen Agnifilo, also requested immediate expedited discovery from state prosecutors which the judge seemed to agree with. She again questioned who has jurisdiction for their case to go first, state or federal? Last week she raised the issue of the dualing state and federal investigations + indictments being an example of double jeopardy. Prosecutor today says state has priority.

The full state hearing is below 👇🏿
https://youtu.be/JPf-vzvvWRI

#LuigiMangione
Luigi Mangione sits in court. His hands are visibly shackled to his waist. He is surrounded by five armed police officers whom all look down at him.
Mangione is led through the court house. He's dressed in a collard shirt and sweater. His hands and feet a shackled. He's surrounded by four police officers in formal wear and several uniformed police look on.
Mangione is led through the court house. He's dressed in a collard shirt and sweater. His hands and feet a shackled. He's surrounded by four police officers in formal wear and several uniformed police look on.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (3 Wochen her)
Also today we found out the federal judge who will hear Luigi's pretrial sentencing is Katherine Parker. As luck would have it Judge Parker's husband is a recently retired Pfizer executive. The two have deep ties to the health care industry.

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/luigi-mangione-judge-married-to-former

#Judge #KatherineParker #BrettParker #LuigiMangione
seems like grounds for recusal
The jury CAN in fact refuse to convict anyone for ANY reason. So can any one juror since it is a unanimous vote.

There is no legal way to punish or sanction any juror for any vote, no matter what. The most they can do is declare a mistrial, which has the same effect as a deadlocked jury.

No jury containing me could ever convict anyone for any "offense" against any CEO. Probable deadlock, possible acquittal, forget conviction.
They can refile the charges, but after repeated hung juries eventually give up. Speedy trial demands combined with this can create real problems for prosecutors.

If the give up and don't refile, there is no pending charge and any further hold is illegal so far as I know.