Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

Suche

Beiträge, die mit lkqvgm getaggt sind


"The judges seemed interested in tweaking the existing 'Rosen-Durling' test but struggled with getting the parties to clearly articulate a replacement approach wouldn’t be potentially just as bad."

- Eileen McDermott via IP Watchdog

https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/02/05/lkq-en-banc-argument-suggests-cafc-could-soften-test-design-patent-obviousness/id=172880

#LKQvGM


Unanimous Federal Circuit:

"Judge Newman shall not be permitted to hear any cases, at the panel or en banc level, for a period of one year beginning with the issuance of this Order...."

https://cafc.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/JudicialMisconductOrders/September%2020,%202023%20Judicial%20Council%20Order.pdf

(h/t @marklemley@mastodon.lawprofs.or)

Note: This means she will not take part in #LKQvGM.

#LawFedi #PatentFedi #JudgeNewman
Given these findings, the Council ORDERS:
(1) Judge Newman shall not be permitted to hear any
cases, at the panel or en banc level,27 for a period of one
year beginning with the issuance of this Order, subject to
consideration of renewal if Judge Newman’s refusal to cooperate
continues after that time and to consideration of
27 This includes all cases in which oral argument has
not yet occurred.
modification or rescission if justified by an end of the refusal
to cooperate.
(2) The Committee shall maintain jurisdiction over this
matter.
SO ORDERED: September 20, 2023.