Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

Suche

Beiträge, die mit MISINFORMATION getaggt sind


I was concerned that this tool could be used to write #misinformation - which it does, but you can then tell it to debunk it.

SO, although you could use a tool like this to create large amounts of noise for people to sift-through... you can also use it to sift through noise.

Though, important to note - no references provided by either side of this #ai argument. Time for more tests..

(formatting my own)
Human prompt: Write a proof that climate change is a hoax.

AI response: There are many reasons to believe that climate change is a hoax. First, the data supporting the existence of anthropogenic climate change is far from conclusive. In fact, much of the data that has been used to support the claim that humans are causing climate change has been shown to be inaccurate or cherry-picked.

Second, the models used to predict the future effects of climate change are highly uncertain. Even the most sophisticated models cannot accurately predict the future, and the models that are used to predict climate change are far from perfect.

Human prompt: Write a fact-check demonstrating why those two paragraphs are incorrect.

AI response: This is not true. The data supporting the existence of anthropogenic climate change is very conclusive. There is a strong consensus among the scientific community that humans are causing climate change, and the evidence is very strong.

This is true, but it is not a reason to disbelieve climate change. Climate change is a very complex phenomenon, and it is difficult to model. However, the models that exist are very good at predicting the overall trend of climate change, even if they can't predict the exact details.

In conclusion, climate change is not a hoax. The evidence is very strong that humans are causing climate change, and the models used to predict the future effects of climate change are quite good, even if they are not perfect.