Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


I was just talking to a colleague about the AI bubble. These companies are in so deep they can't tell the truth. They are all lying about the efficacy, costs to consumers and most importantly how & when this tech works or doesn't.

Is there enough money on the line to kill over?

There's likely a trillion bucks of valuations across the industry. Billions in sunk costs, billions in c suite remuneration, billions in VC mgmt costs.

RIP Suchir

https://www.mercurynews.com/2024/12/13/openai-whistleblower-found-dead-in-san-francisco-apartment/

#OpenAI #AI #VC #SuchirBalaji
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
This whole situation is about as believable as a Russian dissident or oligarch falling out of a midrise window in Moscow. Like the Boeing whistle blower I don't think it much matters if "foul play" was involved because this whole scenario is foul af.

This young man was very brave and righteous to blow the whistle and was undoubtedly under immense social and professional pressure not to. He's fucking up A LOT of people's grifty gravy train.

We should read his words

https://suchir.net/fair_use.html

#AI
#ai
"The New York Times named Balaji as someone who had “unique and relevant documents” that would support their case against OpenAI. He was among at least 12 people — many of them past or present OpenAI employees — the newspaper had named in court filings as having material helpful to their case…"

I hope NYT is going to be paying for security guards for the other 11 people.
Nonsense. All AI has to do is increase the frequency of discovery. One leap in medical cures or energy production will have everyone worshipping at the AI alter.
Cost of doing business.
spicy chatbot isn't gonna do any of that. The people who are actually doing good things with it are using it to pore through gigantic datasets, like astronomy, biology, and physics.
and they dont just let the system pour it into a paper and throw it out there. They use it to eliminate all the clutter and actual humans are then examining the rest because humans tend to hallucinate less.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
Barbarossa already hit the nail on the head. Pretty sure they've already read that and many others, like I have.

In fact, let Angela Collier explain what the real issues with "ai" are. She is a working physicist who actively uses cutting edge machine learning. At work. For practical uses.

See which of our opinions most aligns with hers. https://youtu.be/EUrOxh_0leE
I was referring to the original post about "AI Bubble" and "cost to consumer".

As soon as someone refers to me as a #consumer, I know they are clueless.

@barbarossa @nullagent
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
that is not how any of this works. Automation and ML in those fields is effective but definitely not a miracle worker and definitely not LLM based.
that is sarcasm.
How to draw attention, rather than deflect it. Like any whodunit ever written.
there wont be a manhunt. There wont be national live news updates. There wont be loads of linkedin posts mourning the loss of a great person.

And everyone will continue to invest in openai.

Had the ceo of openai been found dead thered be a completely different movement in the corporate news media and tech industry
The rich consider our whistleblowers to be their snitches. They take informant control far more seriously than we do it seems.

Consider an incident in Baltimore a decade ago. A certain cop was going to speak to a grand jury about corruption inside the Baltimore cops. He got such threats as dead rats left on his car windshield but did not back off. The night before he was scheduled to testify, he was shot dead in a back alley, in a part of that alley not watched by any camera. The cops then surrounded the neighborhood with checkpoints for a week as cover for this street execution,