Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


The UK's pivot from fossil fuels to renewables over the last ten years has now reached the point where this year we will be (regularly) using renewables more than fossil fuels for electricity generation.... it may still leave too much reliance on fossil fuels, but the trend, if slower than one might like, remains encouraging (as does the lack of an expansion of nuclear).

#electricity #renewableEnergy #climate
Chart: Wind, solar & hydropower are set to generate more electricity that fossil fuels in the UK this year. Annnual (%)

shows fossil fuels declining from over 60% in 2014 to less than 40% this year, while renewables have grown in the same period from around 10% to nearly 40%; nuclear remains below 20% with some slight decline, against biomass which has grown from around 10% t nearly 20% over the same period
Most of the renewables we have came online in the last ten years and we would have come further but for Tory policy. We’re living now with a temporary hiatus caused by them. It’s estimated we need roughly three times the amount of wind and solar and, at that point, gas will only be used on those occasions we get a high pressure system stuck over the country. The good part is how quickly that growth can be built if we stay serious about it.
yes, that was what I thought was key about the graph - the progress over ten years in a hostile political environment....
The graph on the left here shows the actual composition of electricity generation over the last 28 days. The graph on the right shows the effect if we treble the available wind and solar and have Hinkley C online. In fact we get much of the benefit just by doubling the wind capacity. It took eight years to get from the first hour without coal to no coal at all. I’m looking forward to the first single hour without gas fired generation.


I'm looking forward to getting to no nuclear too, because creating utterly toxic waste, for our grandchildren's grandchildren so we can run our fridges, Tesla's and AI data centres, is the definition of... something or other.

@ChrisMayLA6
You’ll be pleased to know that nuclear has been in steady decline for many years. The main driver is the fact that many nuclear power stations have had to shut through old age. Even the ones still open are running at less than capacity because renewables drive down the need for their output. When Hinkley C comes online several more lifetime-expired sites will shut down. https://www.mygridgb.co.uk/historicaldata/
Stacked bar chart of generation makeup each year since 2012. Nuclear generation has been in slow decline all this time
Yes - I follow it a bit. But our lovely new government is committed to more nuclear apparently. I'm an accountant and am fairly sure that the true cost has never ever been calculated - much less actually attributed to the price we pay

@ChrisMayLA6
It takes a special kind of fool to authorise another £30Bn money pit in the wake of Hinkley C when all the evidence indicates that renewables will have eaten its market in far less time than it takes to build. The only rationale is as a replacement for the old nuclear plants that are well past their design life. So that gets you two 3.2GW nuclear plants to replace the 5.6GW we are trying to keep going.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (1 Monat her)
the point no decision maker ever makes is that those who want electricity (pretty much all of us) need to ‘own’ the decisions about how it’s generated. I cannot stand our spineless politicians who just get every decision wrong.
They’ve got every decision ‘right’ from the point of view of their accountant. We have governance refined to serve oligarchy very well.
Yes - we really do. It's almost as though our politicians from both major parties were just there to serve corporate interests, with no real regard for the people.

Oh wait...

@ChrisMayLA6
Nuclear was only ever about making weapons grade plutonium.
know a lad whose just taken a grad job at Sellafield. Wait with interest to hear how that goes…