Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


This article is so concerned with portraying the risks with Putin (as if there is some hope that Trump is not already complicit) that it can't see Trump for who he is. At the very least, it is softly playing the 'too close' line instead of asking: what sort of person wants to do this?

This is the line by which the article signals its intention to engage in both-sides diplomacy, instead of unconstrained reporting:

"Dialogues, however, are nothing new."

And with that, it's in the can for another day, and continuity of thought is broken.

#uspol #auspol #journalism

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-20/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-analysis-after-zelenskyy-spray/104953186
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (2 Wochen her)