Friendica Social Network (Leipzig)

Suche

Beiträge, die mit attribution getaggt sind

petersuber

2 Jahre her

petersuber
2 Jahre her

Update. I'm pulling a few other comments into this thread, in preparation for extending it later.

1. I have mixed feelings on #attribution in peer review. I see the benefits, but I also see the benefits of #anonymity.
https://twitter.com/petersuber/status/1412455826397204487

2. For #AI today, good #reviews are a harder problem than good #summaries.
https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109954904433171308

3. Truth detection is a deep, hard problem. Automating it is even harder.
https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109921214854932516

#PeerReview #OpenPeerReview

petersuber (@petersuber@fediscience.org)

Update. I said above (4th item in thread) that "for a bot maker, it will be more profitable to solve the marketing problem (bring in users) than the truth-telling problem." I stand by that but want to clarify. The reason is not greed.

^{FediScience.org}

#ai #attribution #reviews #PeerReview #OpenPeerReview #anonymity #summaries

Bitte warten

Im Zusammenhang betrachten

Update. I acknowledge that there's no bright line between using these tools to polish one's language and using them to shape one's judgments of quality. I also ack that these tools are steadily getting better at "knowing the field". That's why this is a hard problem.

One way to ensure that reviewers take #responsibility for their judgments is #attribution.

#PeerReview #OpenPeerReview