So, back in 2016, I posted a cartoon on the bird shite site that involved Trump thanking Obama for all the sweeping powers he now had because Obama had instituted those powers thinking that there was no way the White House would fall into non-Democratic Party hands. I can dig up the articles (and the cartoon) to back up these claims -- and I probably will, considering Trump will again have all those expanded powers and then some... There is shit that can be put into place if a "National Emergency" is declared, and it's not pretty. But again, it was all under Obama's watch... (Though the groundwork was established before Obama.)
#NDAA #ExpandedPowers #USPresidency #NationalEmergency
#NDAA #ExpandedPowers #USPresidency #NationalEmergency
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (5 Monate her)
DoomsdaysCW •
#NDAA #ExpandedPowers
#USPresidency #NationalEmergency #Drones #HR9495 #Terrorists #Activists #MattBors #USPol #BorderEmergency
LukefromDC hat dies geteilt
Fragarach •
Welcome to Guantanamo!
Come for the sunshine, stay for the waterboarding!
#NDAA #ExpandedPowers #USPresidency #NationalEmergency #Drones #HR9495 #Terrorists #Activists #MattBors
LukefromDC hat dies geteilt
DoomsdaysCW •
What the President Could Do If He Declares a #StateOfEmergency
From seizing control of the #internet to declaring #MartialLaw, President #Trump may legally do all kinds of extraordinary things.
by Elizabeth Goitein | January/February 2019
"It would be nice to think that America is protected from the worst excesses of Trump’s impulses by its democratic laws and institutions. After all, Trump can do only so much without bumping up against the limits set by the Constitution and Congress and enforced by the courts. Those who see Trump as a threat to democracy comfort themselves with the belief that these limits will hold him in check.
But will they? Unknown to most Americans, a parallel legal regime allows the president to sidestep many of the constraints that normally apply.
"The moment the president declares a 'national emergency' — a decision that is entirely within his discretion — more than 100 special provisions become available to him. While many of these tee up reasonable responses to genuine emergencies, some appear dangerously suited to a leader bent on amassing or retaining power. For instance, the president can, with the flick of his pen, activate laws allowing him to shut down many kinds of electronic communications inside the United States or freeze Americans’ bank accounts. Other powers are available even without a declaration of emergency, including laws that allow the president to #DeployTroops inside the country to subdue #DomesticUnrest.
"This edifice of extraordinary powers has historically rested on the assumption that the president will act in the country’s best interest when using them. With a handful of noteworthy exceptions, this assumption has held up. But what if a president, backed into a corner and facing electoral defeat or impeachment, were to declare an emergency for the sake of holding on to power? In that scenario, our laws and institutions might not save us from a presidential power grab. They might be what takes us down."
Read more:
https://archive.li/hyWR6#selection-1745.0-1767.508
#NDAA
#ExpandedPowers
#USPresidency
#NationalEmergency #Fascism #CharacteristicsOfFascism
DoomsdaysCW •
Executive order expands presidential prerogative
By Jeffrey T. Kuhner - The Washington Times - Thursday, March 22, 2012
"President Obama has given himself the powers to declare #MartialLaw - especially in the event of a war with #Iran. It is a sweeping #PowerGrab that should worry every American.
"On March 16, the White House released an executive order, 'National Defense Resources Preparedness.' The document is stunning in its audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution. It states that, in case of a war or national emergency, the federal government has the authority to take over almost every aspect of American society. Food, livestock, farming equipment, manufacturing, industry, energy, transportation, hospitals, health care facilities, water resources, defense and construction - all of it could fall under the full control of Mr. Obama. The order empowers the president to dispense these vast resources as he sees fit during a national crisis."
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/22/obamas-power-grab/
Obama's Executive Order:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness
Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness
whitehouse.govDoomsdaysCW •
December 31, 2011
WASHINGTON – "President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (#NDAA) into law today. The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision. While President Obama issued a signing statement saying he had 'serious reservations' about the provisions, the statement only applies to how his administration would use the authorities granted by the NDAA, and would not affect how the law is interpreted by subsequent administrations. The White House had threatened to veto an earlier version of the NDAA, but reversed course shortly before Congress voted on the final bill.
"'President Obama's action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,' said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU executive director. 'The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and FUTURE PRESIDENTS to militarily #detain people captured far from any battlefield. The ACLU will fight worldwide detention authority wherever we can, be it in court, in Congress, or internationally.'
"Under the #BushAdministration, similar claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen detained on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress now assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way again. The ACLU believes that any military detention of #AmericanCitizens or others within the United States is unconstitutional and illegal, including under the NDAA. In addition, the breadth of the NDAA’s detention authority violates international law because it is not limited to people captured in the context of an actual armed conflict as required by the laws of war.
"'We are incredibly disappointed that President Obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court,' said Romero. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the #WarOnTerror was extinguished today. Thankfully, we have three branches of government, and the final word belongs to the Supreme Court, which has yet to rule on the scope of detention authority. But Congress and the president also have a role to play in cleaning up the mess they have created because no American citizen or anyone else should live in fear of this or any future president misusing the NDAA’s detention authority.'"
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/president-obama-signs-indefinite-detention-bill-law
#NDAA #ExpandedPowers
#USPresidency #HR9495 #Terrorists #Activists #Trump
President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law
American Civil Liberties UnionHugs4friends ♾🇺🇦 🇵🇸😷 hat dies geteilt