Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


In a complete reversal of National alliance and economic dogma, #Trump and #Republicans behavior appears to be now fully aligned with #Russia and #China.
If #Democrats fail to rebalance the US government in #election2026 then US Democracy is forever changed into a corporate oligarchy.
The remaining nations not aligned to Russia and China should join forces, make stronger alliances without the US to defend against the rise of the #Communist nations.
#2026election
#premarket
#investing

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

So Communism is the problem here. Yeah. right.
You don't actually believe that either Russia or China are communist nations, do you?
In China, the state owns all land, but individuals and companies can obtain rights to use the land for a fee. Individuals can also own homes and apartments on the land. No matter how you describe it, China is on par with Cuba and North Korea in Communism. The state owns the land and picks the corporate enterprise needed to achieve state goals.
Russia has moved from Communism in the late 90s to Dictatorship currently.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
And who is this state you’re referring to? You can’t seriously think that you’re referring to the people when you say things like the “goals of the state.” A small party of wealthy elites hardly represents the “state” or the people.

Also, North Korea is not a communist nation. It’s a dictatorship half-heartedly pretending to masquerade as a communist nation.

I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment that Trump is aligning us with dictators who have been out to destroy most of the western world for decades. But you are very incorrectly assigning the label of communists to these nations.
Here you go! A map of Communist countries.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_communist_states

Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one.

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

You can keep claiming you know what nations are communist
Or you can just walk away.

Your choice of fool.
You claimed that countries outside of these new US alliances should defend against the rise of communist nations.

Just based on the last link YOU shared, and your admission that Russia hasn't been a communist nation in over 30 years, Russia is not a communist nation. So, we can eliminate that from your original statement. The US is not, and under the current administration, will never be a communist nation. In your own words you said Democracy will forever be changed into a corporate oligarchy. There is nothing communist about corporate oligarchies. This eliminates 2/3rds of the nations you referenced specifically in your original "defend against communist nations" statement.

Again, from this most recent link, China is listed as Socialist with Chinese characteristics, hence, not communist. Land may not be able to be held as private property, but the means of production created on that land are not owned communally, based on the description YOU have provided and based on the realities of corporations being able to own said means of production. Does China get closer to communism than most of these other countries, including ones you've listed? Absolutely. But to call China a communist nation is misleading at best.

Leaving out nuance when discussing complex topics and using the "everything I don't like is communism" argument is disingenuous, and, as I've previously stated, weak.
The map demonstrates that it’s clearly partisan and largely stupid. China does not call itself communist nation. They recognize they lack most criteria for that designation. China has a far more internally competitive marketplace than exists in the US.

Russia stopped being a state capitalist nation when the USSR collapsed. US neoliberals oversaw the sale of state enterprises, and of course, in such a way to guarantee oligarchy rather than a market economy.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
Read the list of references.

I think it's funny how accounts on #mastodon like to argue with published references.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

looked at the published references and they don’t signify anything. Without a declared definition of communism, is useless.*

EG “capitalists” from Silicon Valley denounce competition as they denounce democracy. Economic consolidation in the US has extinguished market dynamics in multiple sectors. Sprawling companies like Amazon are centralized command in control economic entity.

* contrast capitalism by IMF

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2015/06/basics.htm
You seem to be quite attached to labels rather than observable traits and behaviors, which is what I prefer to focus on.

How are societies actually structured? How do they actually operate? These are the questions the field of anthropology ask because that field is quite aware of the distinction between what people say about themselves and what they actually do.

I prefer not to be a credulous schmuck.
There is a difference between uninformed and credulous.
Ellman, Michael (2014). Socialist Planning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Daniel (1993). Soviet Marxism–Leninism: The Decline of an Ideology.
Feldbrugge, F. J. M. (1985). "Council of Ministers". In Feldbrugge, F. J. M.; Van den Berg, G. P.; Simons, William B. (eds.).
Furtak, Robert K. (1987). The Political Systems of the Socialist States. New York City: St. Martin's Press.
Uninformed are people who argue with published references.

Credulous are people who can't take a reasonable position based on published references.
Hey, look here's a paper with published references that has been completely discredited. Oops.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(97)11096-0/fulltext
Seriously, you’re saying that a list of published references are an argument?

A drunk uses a lamp post, as support rather than for illumination
Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one.

Yet not everyone is a published reference

Again, you're not arguing with me here as much as you would like to.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

This discussion reminds me of everything dangerous with #mastodon and the rise of #socialmedia.

When random accounts claim they are the experts on bias as they dismiss a century of publishing they never took the time to READ.
#fediverse
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

Dangerous because it doesn't come from the CIA World Factbook or a publicly editable source on the internet?

GTFOH with your high-horse bullshit. You didn't even read the Wikipedia article you linked.

If you had, you'd have seen this:
Disputed ’ Although founded as a Marxist-Leninist state, North Korea began moving away from orthodox Marxism-Leninism and replaced all references to Marxism-Leninism in the Constitution of North Korea with Juche in 1992.! In 2009, the constitution was quietly amended so that not only did it remove all Marxist-Leninist references present in the first draft, but it also dropped all reference to communism.! According to North Korea: A Country Study by Robert L. Worden, Marxism-Leninism was abandoned immediately after the start of de- Stalinisation in the Soviet Union and it has been totally replaced by Juche since at least 1974 The government's official ideology is now the Juche part of Kimilsungism~Kimjongilism policy of Kim Il Sung as opposed to orthodox Marxism-Leninism. The ruling Workers' Party of Korea reinstated its goal towards communism in 2021.1% Some communists, especially the anti revisionists, call the DPRK a non manxist socialist state. o e o] o e o o] e R R | e I I Workers' Party of | Kimilsungism-— o Koren MR: Chosn Minjujudi Inmin 9 September 1948 - Konghwaguk
By that then you’re claiming that you’ve read all of these books.

You are asserting received wisdom based on either on a limited bibliography either read or unread by yourself.
You guys published yet?

Come back when you are used as a reference or have a valid argument.

CHINA and RUSSIA have been communist for longer than you both have been alive.

I promise lol 😜
Good fucking day. Go read some history books.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

Who's talking about history? We're talking about right now, as you were in your original statement. I never made the claim that Russia and China were NEVER communist. I'm simply stating a fact that they are not currently communist nations.

Even YOU said Russia isn't a communist nation any more. Remember where you said this?

If you weren't making up things on the fly and failing to insult people, you'd have an easier time remembering what it was you said.
@RememberUsAlways@newsie.social @mike Russia has moved from Communism in the late 90s to Dictatorship currently.
Indeed, you’re just a random guy on social media claiming, Cartman like, everyone respect his authority.
@

Perhaps but I'm not so full of myself to dispute published references while I opine on zero facts in a thread I attempted to hijack with no reference.

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

You still seem to be ignoring the fact that YOU eliminated 2/3rds of the nations YOU labeled as communist in your initial reply to me.

Your original point that the US is pivoting away from its allies is 100% valid, as I've stated previously. But your stance that the US is aligning itself with communist nations is 100% false.

Also, the very first reference on the Wikipedia link you shared was a link to the CIA World Factbook, further reinforcing my point that you subscribe a CIA-defined, US-centered view of the world and communism.

Just admit that you misused or don't fully understand communism. There's no shame in admitting you were wrong. There is shame in continuing to argue points that you, yourself, have mostly disproven.
Again, I'm posting my reference while you don't have any.

You can argue with Wikipedia all day for the entertainment of everyone reading your unreferenced nonsense.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
Again, the VERY FIRST reference in your list is the CIA world Factbook. NOT a credible source.

Just because there is a source citation does not make it a credible source.

Still weak.
I really wouldn’t waste your time on remember us. I have never been keen for people whose lives are a lived violation of the ninth commandment.
My hope is that you'll both go back and read the books and links I used as references while you both just attack me for using references.

Have a great day in ignorance land!
No one attacked you. Or your "references." You didn't read the article you linked. You didn't read the reference material you keep copying and pasting.

You're making an argument in bad faith and you're being called on it.

Do better.
I read everything I've recommended you should read

You are just embarrassed you don't understand who is and has been communist.

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

So define communism by the way. What definition of communism do you use? Can you clearly describe it?

And I am talking about modes of behavior, modes of social structure.

What is communism as a mode of social structure?
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
I have derived entertainment reading heresiologies of early Christianity, filled as they are florid depictions of devils and demons and witchcraft. These books were considered to authoritative in their time and used to burn people at the stake..

They are a tiny corner of the breath of topics I’ve read in my lifetime.
I'll be looking forward to reading your published opinions and using them as references....

Oh sorry. That was never you.
Seems retracted.

How embarrassing.
Good job on intentionally missing the point. You're a credit to your profession, I'm sure.
Oh Lord.. This is rapidly descending into a farce… 😂
It was a farce when both of you decided to dispute the Communist label for Russia and China.

That was both your objections to my toot.

Good thing I use references that you then disputed.

Who are the fools here?
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

For the third fucking time, I'm posting this screenshot of your statement.

Now, answer this: WHO disputed that?

Oh, right. You too.

Fucking arguing with yourself over here. Jesus.
@RememberUsAlways@newsie.social @mike Russia has moved from Communism in the late 90s to Dictatorship currently.
You seem confused. It's possible to be a Communist Dictatorship.

You don't seem to understand that.

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

You seem confused by your own words.

"Russia has moved from Communism in the late 90s"

You didn't say "Russia is now a Communist dictatorship."

No one defines Russia today as a communist nation. Not even the Wikipedia article you linked and keep referencing calls it a communist nation today.

Just admit that you misspoke. Or walk away.
It’s sort of funny because the communist dictatorship structurally, socially is identical to standard corporate structure.

In a centralized command and control entity, a few dictate what to produce, how much to produce when to produce it and under what conditions that production is done.

..
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
Funny thing. Communist structure resembles military structure with clearly deined positions of rank and authority in all aspects of society.
"Funny thing. Communist structure resembles military structure with clearly deined positions of rank and authority in all aspects of society."

Tell me your understanding of communism is based on decades of CIA programming without telling me.
So you’re saying the US military is a communist entity.

I’ll agree with that. In the military context from each according to his ability and to each according to his need.

Veterans enjoy Universal Healthcare, And free education. If they are fed by a commissary they are also receiving free food. They don’t have to pay for their equipment in other words, most of their clothing and almost all their material needs are provided for them.

..
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
But even in highly hierarchical societies, and I’ve worked with Koreans so I know of what I speak, they are a very hierarchical society deferring to age and social position, but operationally they are very strongly consensus based.

No major decisions in most groups are made without significant consultation and debate. Individuals might defer to their mothers or fathers or bosses their teachers and respect authority, but in general, they are very consensus driven.
I don't have time for #history lessons so I leave you with this.
"Communism in its modern form grew out of the socialist movement in 18th-century France, in the aftermath of the French Revolution. During the upheaval, communism emerged as a political doctrine with the writings of François-Noël Babeuf, Nicolas Restif de la Bretonne, and Sylvain Maréchal, all of whom can be considered the progenitors of modern communism, according to James H. Billington."
@histodons
@histodons

No one needed that history lesson or to tag in a group of people who have nothing to do with this discussion.

Explain how this proves your original point that Russia and China are communist nations TODAY.
@histodons

That only describes historical evolution. It says nothing about how they function, how people operate in them.

And by the way, completely ignores the diversity of institutions their functional and dysfunctional behaviors.

Each nation has its own unique history and its own unique institutions for better or worse.

Monolithic descriptions of society is an absurdity on its face.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
I blocked @mike@social.raytec.co for harassment but I thank you Ghost for the discussion.

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

Can’t say it’s shared sentiment. You made a number of assertions and a number of presumptions about myself and Mike.

Yet this discussion demonstrates that you were absolutely wrong in that and that I think if you were somebody brought up with good religious upbringing that taught you morals, things like the 10 Commandments, the injunction against false witness, which I think you have engaged in here, you would at least show some contrition and apologize
@mike@social.raytec.co

Hold up.

You came into my thread. You continue to dispute the label of Communist for Russia and China in the face of facts.

I've been more than willing to engage with you but it's you who are wrong.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

You can assert whatever you want that’s your prerogative.

You will not find me compliant with your authoritarian fiat.

Have a good day
Ignorance is bliss.

Take care. Let me know when you are a published reference on Wikipedia.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

You know the funny part is I could go in and open up Wikipedia and find an entire library of references that would dispute and refute your references. Wikipedia is a very very large animal.

Emotionally manipulative fallacious arguments piss people off
To my knowledge there are no communist nations extant today, either by ML definitions or any other reasonable criteria. There are plenty of authoritarian regimes of various descriptions.
You say books and links you use as reference. How many of them have you personally read? I’m just curious.
Just as a matter of curiosity, is this the extent of your education in this topic?
This is my final reply to your insults.
In China, the state owns all land, but individuals and companies can obtain rights to use the land for a fee. Individuals can also own homes and apartments on the land. No matter how you describe it, China is on par with Cuba and North Korea in Communism. The state owns the land and picks the corporate enterprise needed to achieve state goals.
So, by that definition. China is not a communist nation. Communism requires the means of production to be owned communally, not by private entities who pay a fee to use land.

Thanks for proving my point. Have the day you deserve.
I enjoy title and deed to all my property. I'll never have to give up my property to the US government.
Ever.

Capitalism evolved from feudalism and you dim wits don't read history.

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

"I enjoy title and deed to all my property. I'll never have to give up my property to the US government.
Ever. "

Thanks for also proving you don't understand the difference between private property and personal property.

"Capitalism evolved from feudalism and you dim wits don't read history."

Who said otherwise? No one mentioned feudalism nor is anyone debating the evolution of capitalism.

But, I guess you made some point there. Good job! Gold star for you!
Forgetting that there are several layers of authority in the United States. not only do you have the federal government but you have the state county and local governments.

If you don’t pay taxes, they can place a lien on your property or confiscate it. Or they can declare eminent domain and take your property with some compensation.

Property is regularly seized by police.

Corporations are notorious for coercing land from their owners.
Property tax is part of ownership in the US.

Breaking laws can have consequences.
So you acknowledge that you MAY have to give up your property to the US government or any number of other authorities.

Good. You're making progress.
I acknowledge you don't understand English and enjoy harassing people who call out your ignorance.
"WAAAHHHH I KEEP SAYING DUMB THINGS AND GETTING CALLED OUT ON IT! I'M BEING ATTACKED AND HARRASSED!!! WAAAAHHH!!!"

As I keep saying. Weak.
Ready?

Communist China.

Communist Russia.

These are "dumb things" people say in your world.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

Sounds like the things I often hear the MAGA hat wearing folks say, so yes, I agree, dumb.

Glad we could find common ground.
So your attacks on me in this thread are based on what MAGA says?

Go boil an egg you troll
LMAO. No that was a direct response to you using the phrases "Communist China" and "Communist Russia." Because only the uneducated and uninformed really believe either of those phrases.

You can't even keep up with your OWN statements in this discussion but you're trying to twist everything I've said based on one comment. That's adorable.
So in other words in China, if you pay a fee to be able to use a piece of land as you see fit is evil. Property taxes, capitalism. Paying a fee to acquire property will also known as a purchase price with no property tax is communism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_China

The most frequently quoted definition of communism is the state owning the means of production (private property).

Personal property is distinct from private property.
Again, you’re just listing book titles, as if they are authoritative. By themselves that is simply uninteresting.

For instance, there are any number of mainstream economic books/papers that have been absolutely destroyed mathematically. None of their work holds up to mathematical scrutiny.

You and I work with different criteria I work with observation and where applicable mathematical rigor. And I see no evidence of you sharing those criteria
Uninteresting is people who argue with published references.

Let me when your opinions are published as reference.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)
Uninteresting is people who are unable to identify bias in "published references."

Keep digging in deeper, it's totally making your point more valid.
You speak of bias while you promote nothing attacking the US and capitalism.

You both simply can't deal with facts.

Russia and China are both communist nations and without shame in that label.
Always have been.
But keep arguing with a century of publishing.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (4 Wochen her)

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

So, now you're arguing with yourself about Russia being a communist country? You can't even keep your own statements straight and you keep pasting lists of references as if you're citing a source.

"But keep arguing with a century of publishing."

Because nothing changes over the course of 100 years, right? Nixon didn't open trade relations with China which brought their economy from one much closer to actual communism to the socialist capitalist state run by a misnamed group of party elites that it is today.

Your entire argument makes no sense and throwing a Wikipedia article's list of references (an article you obviously didn't read) into the discussion as if you're citing FACTS from those articles/books/studies is further proof that your cognitive dissonance has replaced any point of trying to show you how bias and feelings have clouded your understanding of what's actually going on here.

COMMUNISM BAD AND EVERYTHING I DON'T LIKE IS COMMUNISM.

Weak.
Quote from RememberUsAlways @RememberUsAlways@newsie.social

@mike

Russia has moved from Communism in the late 90s to Dictatorship currently.
You are mad because you can't back up your attacks on me with any references.

My opinions are based on history. What are your opinions based on?

What you read online?

RememberUsAlways hat dies geteilt

You're literally reading what you're spouting online from a publicly editable source and copying and pasting a list of references that you aren't even actually citing. You're just saying "Look at these references that I'm hoping claim what I say!"

How pathetic.
100% more references than you are using attacking published references.
References don't mean shit unless you've actually read them and know what they're referring to.

Point invalidated.