Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

Someone in Belgium, Dirk Holemans, argues that instead of using 'ontgroei' (degrowth), we should use the term 'omgroei', which is similar, but not quite the same as regrowth. Re-growth is a repeating, restoring thing; om-groei is a changed growth.
Yes.. I was just musing a bit on the terms. There's wordplay in #Regrowth in that it also means starting anew i.e. create a wholly alternative system to that of world-destroying #Hypercapitalism

The #capitalism seed sprouted a horrendous meat-eating fungus. Need to replant a new organic system to take over and collectively kindle a seedling to regrow #humanity into healthy #sustainability-first direction. So there's a #future for mankind, and not #extinction.
sounds like the #thrivability alternative to #sustainability. we need to avoid focusing on compromise and resignment, which do not help supplant the previous systems.
I work on premise of holistic sustainability, loosely based on #CirclesOfSustainablity model, which I redefined to better align with natural and emergent systems (see alt-text).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circles_of_Sustainability

#SustainabilityFirst and at all times is crucial, for many reasons. Like span-of-control in keeping the system sustainable in the 1st place. What's fun is that a lot of concepts start to become circular in further philosophical elaboration. More akin to our natural world.
Alternative to Circles of Sustainability where there is one all-encompasing Technology circle, within it is a Venn diagram of the circles Culture, Economics and Ecology with equal overlap and one sweet spot of holistic sustainability at its center.

The Politics circle has been removed from the equation on the premise that this is an emergent force. Politics shape up from the collective incentives of participants in all the various different social contexts, to influence and affect outcome of human interactions. By removing "politics" a much overloaded, controversial concept can be steered clear of, leading to more fruitful discussion (is the idea).
Btw in this diagram it is clear that a #sociosphere is needed, or else we are all stuck in the #technosphere as we are today.

I call the hypothetical sweet spot where socio and technosphere are seamlessly aligned and tuned to the needs of people and planet a #peopleverse ..

The current #fediverse is a typical technosphere. We can emulate some "social" but social bandwidth is tiny. There's a lot of "manual social" (the regular kind) we can do to improve, realizing this.
It is extremely difficult to tame and control human communication, or simulate a sociosphere, when limiting expression to #500characters (default on sw) just so owners of servers can emulate twitter

Then owners of servers are free to erase what has already been said and often make a participant vanish.

Only in the worst of American dictatorships did people vanish at such high rates silently

@smallcircles @travisfw @mysteriarch
You have technospheres and then you have technospheres. Some support more social than others. We need one that can carry a #society and it ain't the current #fedi for sure.

😅