Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

More like another plain of existence.
The other leg of the space-time trousers?
If you're going to bring Douglas Adams into it, I'm going home.

(I have no idea if "space time trousers" are anything to do with Douglas Adams)
It's Terry Pratchett not a sometime Dr Who scriptwriter.
Well, look, Keynes is so 1930s. I'm advised that they do discuss macroeconomics at Oxford, but you wouldn't believe it. It looks like you can achieve a first in PPE without understanding macroeconomics (vide Cameron).
You can achieve a first in PPE at Oxford if you buy them a new library or whatever.
Donate £150m like Schwarzman of Blackstone and you can have your eponymous Humanities Research Institute (check that irony against Blackstone).
Are you perchance thinking of the Rupert Murdoch library at Worcester College?

More seriously, PPE would be less maligned if they insisted on the philosophy and ethics middle P and not just the ‘How to be a complete knob with a pretend smattering of economics’ bits.
Not specifically. Another win for generalised cynicism 😐
Or, put another way, I can imagine all sorts of reasons you might want to study politics, or economics, or philosophy. But for a kid to actually say ‘I want to do PPE at Oxford’, that’s a bit of a wanker warning.
At this point in human history I'd be concerned about anyone wanted to study philosophy or politics as well.
There are one or two very interesting people there in political theory:

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v46/n24/sophie-smith/sleeping-women

https://sophiesmithoxford.com/

Historians used to have a paper on Pol Theory.
Following Keynesian principles would have saved decades of pain, but he's clearly out of fashion since I was taught economics by a left-wing economist 5 decades ago.

How Cameron got into Oxford without the requisite 2 brain cells is beyond me.
I'll preface this by saying I know fuck all about economics, macro or otherwise, but my layman's understanding is that Keynes and free market capitalism are, shall we say, incompatible.
How David Cameron got into Oxford is by having a vaguely aristo Mummy and a very rich Daddy.
Depends where the growth happens and who the benefactors of said growth will be. Mass unemployment is a problem for someone else to solve, charities maybe? Self-employment even!
They may as well admit they're trying to kill off the poors at this point.
"Everyone shuffle another rung further down the social mobility ladder to make room for AI".