Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen
ChatGPT, Meta and Google generative AI should be designated 'high-risk' under new laws, bipartisan committee recommends https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-26/chatgpt-high-risk-ai-act-creative-theft/104646664 via @ABCaustralia Australian Parliamentary Committee recommends stronger copyright laws to address AI: 'If the widespread theft of tens of thousands of Australians' creative works by big multinational tech companies, without authorisation or remuneration, is not already unlawful, then it should be.' #auslaw #auspol #AI #regulation #copyright

ChatGPT, Meta and Google generative AI should be designated 'high-risk' under new laws, bipartisan committee recommends

Generative artificial intelligence tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT should be deemed "high-risk" under dedicated legislation that could enable the most dangerous technologies to be banned, a bipartisan committee recommends.
Jake Evans (ABC News)

Matthew Rimmer hat dies geteilt

ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
Yes. It should indeed be unlawful.

#auspol
#auspol
Matthew Rimmer
This month, I've read 30 of the current copyright law suits in the US about AI. There are evidential issues proving copyright infringement by AI models (has a substantial part of the copyright work been used...) . There are further debates around copyright exceptions. Some of the secondary arguments about electronic rights management information are getting knocked back by judges. Its going to be messy and long-winded to resolve these disputes. I suspect there could be split views amongst judges (from what's happening at a preliminary stage).
Matthew Rimmer
We don't know the outcome of the cases yet - so it would be premature to presume that there is an injustice or an immorality.
Matthew Rimmer
A lot will turn on the scope of the economic right of reproduction. There is a doctrinal question of whether an AI model will reproduce a substantial part of a copyright work?
⇧