Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

Suche

Beiträge, die mit Copyright getaggt sind


Reuters: News Corp sued by Brave Software, a Google search engine rival. “News Corp has been sued by Google search engine rival Brave Software, which seeks to forestall a lawsuit by Rupert Murdoch’s company for when readers are directed to copyrighted articles from the Wall Street Journal and New York Post.”

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/03/15/reuters-news-corp-sued-by-brave-software-a-google-search-engine-rival/


The goal is correct but the justification is extremely flawed and hypocrite. A company called OpenAI should share way more code and sources to the general public that what it currently shares. And that's why the USA is starting to loose the AI race.

"OpenAI is hoping that Donald Trump's AI Action Plan, due out this July, will settle copyright debates by declaring AI training fair use—paving the way for AI companies' unfettered access to training data that OpenAI claims is critical to defeat China in the AI race.

Currently, courts are mulling whether AI training is fair use, as rights holders say that AI models trained on creative works threaten to replace them in markets and water down humanity's creative output overall.

OpenAI is just one AI company fighting with rights holders in several dozen lawsuits, arguing that AI transforms copyrighted works it trains on and alleging that AI outputs aren't substitutes for original works."

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/03/openai-urges-trump-either-settle-ai-copyright-debate-or-lose-ai-race-to-china

#AI #GenerativeAI #OpenAI #FairUse #Copyright #Trump #USA


Neue US-Regierung im Visier: #OpenAI und #Google fordern freie Hand beim #KI-Training. #Urheberrecht soll dabei bewusst ignoriert werden. KI-Konzerne wittern ihre Chance auf Deregulierung unter Trump #Copyright https://winfuture.de/news,149567.html?utm_source=Mastodon&utm_medium=ManualStatus&utm_campaign=SocialMedia


Chinese Court Rules That AI Image Has Copyright Protection

https://petapixel.com/2025/03/13/chinese-court-rules-that-ai-image-has-copyright-protection/

"The plaintiff with the surname Lin generated an image featuring a heart-shaped balloon. Lin later discovered that two companies had used the design in their social media posts without permission and subsequently filed a lawsuit.

The Changshu People’s Court ordered the defendants to issue a public apology and pay 10,000 yuan (approximately $1,380) in damages".

#AI #Copyright #China


It is rare - extremely rare that I agree with Bad Enoch, but the comments, even if opportunistic (best time to kick a man is whn he is down) two faced given her previous pronouncements are spot on here.

Labour’s plans to reform copyright laws to make it easier for AI companies to operate in the UK are not fit for purpose and must be halted, Kemi Badenoch has said.

http://archive.today/2025.02.26-002820/https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/kemi-badenoch-labours-ai-copyright-reforms-are-a-mess-j8sp65mkt

(apologies for all those offended by the picture)

#Copyright #AI #UnholyMess #SellingOut #Starmer
Photo:P Putitive leader of the opposition


🧵 …ach guck, das Rechtsstreit lange dauern kann nach deren ersten Erkenntnissen (siehe oben) ist ja üblich. Nun scheint aber was in den USA diesbezüglich vorzugehen.

«"Wirklich schlecht für KI-Branche" - KI-Firma verliert in erstem US-Rechtsstreit:
In den USA sind dutzende Gerichtsverfahren anhängig, weil KI mit nicht lizenziertem Material trainiert wurde. Jetzt gibt es einen Rückschlag für die KI-Branche.»

🧑‍⚖️ https://www.heise.de/news/Wirklich-schlecht-fuer-KI-Branche-KI-Firma-verliert-in-erstem-US-Rechtsstreit-10279107.html

#ki #usa #gericht #antiai #lizenz #uspol #copyright #gesetz


🧵 …dass die KI gegenüber seinem Datenklau kritisch zu betrachten ist, hatte ich in der Tootreihe oben schon erwähnt.

«Verstößt OpenAI gegen das Urheberrecht? Ehemaliger Mitarbeiter erhebt schwere Vorwürfe:
Ohne riesige Datenmengen wären die KI-Modelle von OpenAI nicht denkbar. Aber verletzt das KI-Unternehmen bei der Beschaffung dieser Daten die Rechte Dritter? Ein ehemaliger Angestellter hat dazu eine klare Meinung»

©️ https://t3n.de/news/openai-urheberrecht-mitarbeiter-vorwuerfe-1653535/

#ki #datenklau #urheberrecht #openai #copyright


🧵…für das #Training der KI wird #Copyright geschützte #Medien geklaut. Nun ist es sogar Richterlich zugelassen das #Urheberrecht zu brechen.

«Erster KI-Urheberrechtsprozess – LAION darf urheberrechtlich geschütztes #Bild für #KI-Training anbieten:
Das Landgericht #Hamburg hat die Klage eines #Fotografien abgewiesen, der sich dagegen gewehrt hatte, ss eines seiner #Fotos vom gemeinnützigen #Verein #LAION zum #Training sogenannter Künstlicher Intelligenz angeboten wird»

🤖 https://netzpolitik.org/2024/erster-ki-urheberrechtsprozess-laion-darf-urheberrechtlich-geschuetztes-bild-fuer-ki-training-anbieten/


🧵 …hach ja, nicht das erste mal. Schon oben in dieser Toot-Reihe habe ich auf den Datenklau durch das Umgehen vom Copyright der KI-Firmen hingewiesen und wird niemals damit fertig.

«Künstliche Intelligenz–Datenschützer fordern spezifische Anforderungen:
Die Datenschützer der Länder fordern spezifische Regeln beim Einsatz von KI. Gerade beim Training von KI-Modellen kann es ansonsten zu heiklen Vorfällen kommen.»

🤖 https://www.heise.de/news/Kuenstliche-Intelligenz-Datenschuetzer-fordern-spezifische-Anforderungen-9855931.html

#ki #datenschutz #copyright #kitraining #datenklau


🧵 …this may not matter to most, but art, creativity and authors, among others, can lose out in this regard. As I mentioned earlier in German, AI doesn't give a damn about intellectual property.

«OpenAI searches for an answer to its copyright problems:
Why is OpenAI paying publishers if it already took their work?»

©️ https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/30/24230975/openai-publisher-deals-web-search

#openai #ai #ki #copyright #work #stealing #industry #copyleft #cc


🧵 …zugegeben, die Themen rund um die KI füllen thematisch das Sommerloch. Wie es das Copyright ignorant überspringt (siehe oben), könnte nun rechtliche Konsequenzen haben:

«Copyright-Sammelklage gegen Anthropic:
Ein erheblicher Teil der Trainingsdaten für Anthropics KI bestehe aus illegal kopierten Büchern. Diesen Vorwurf erheben Buchautoren in den USA.​»

⚖️ https://www.heise.de/news/Copyright-Sammelklage-gegen-Anthropic-9842038.html

#ki #ai #copyright #Anthropic #illegal #usa #RechtUndGesetz #bucher #buch #kopie #konsequenz #us #vorwurfe


🧵…nicht nur im Bereich um #Copyright (siehe oben), sondern auch bei der Frage der #Haftung. Die wird bewusst abgewiesen von den Firmen und abgelehnt. Sie distanzieren sich bewusst um ihre #Verantwortung zu entgehen.

»Haftungslücke bei autonom agierender KI: Wer zahlt für die Fehler der Maschine?
Wer haftet, wenn #Schäden durch eine KI verursacht werden? Noch gibt es darauf keine klare Antwort. Das muss sich dringend ändern, findet unser #KI-Kolumnist Saim Rolf Alkan.«

🤖 https://t3n.de/news/ki-haftung-1634245/


»Starökonom Piketty: KI basiert auf Diebstahl geistigen Eigentums«

Im Business haben alle ein großes Maul wenn es um das Kleinste um Copyright geht aber sobald es in der KI missbraucht wird schweigen die meisten.

©️ https://futurezone.at/netzpolitik/staroekonom-thomas-piketty-kuenstliche-intelligenz-diebstahl-geistigen-eigentums/402649301

#copyright #kunstlicheintelligenz #daten #datenschutz #diebstahl #eigentum #ki


wie die Plattform #youtube erfolgreich wurde (Kurzfassung): Wir scheißen auf #copyright , #urheberrechte u.ä. Gesetze.


"At EFF, we want our work to be seen and shared widely. That’s why we’ve made our content available under Creative Commons licenses for many years. Today, in that spirit, we are updating the license for most materials on our website, www.eff.org, to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International."

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/open-licensing-promotes-culture-and-learning-thats-why-eff-upgrading-its-creative

#EFF #CC #CreativeCommons #OpenLicensing #Copyright #DigitalRights #IP


TorrentFreak: Publishers Ramp Up Pressure vs. Anna’s Archive, Sci-Hub, Z-Library & Libgen. “The world’s major publishers claim that unlicensed libraries cast a permanent shadow over authors’ ability to make a living from their work. In common with the movie and movie industry counterparts, site-blocking is one of the weapons of choice, albeit against well-prepared opponents.”

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/02/04/torrentfreak-publishers-ramp-up-pressure-vs-annas-archive-sci-hub-z-library-libgen/


#publishing #copyright #newssheet #media #print
Does anyone out there know what exactly do I need to publish a local free sheet without laying myself open to malice, legal action etc. i.e. Small company formation in the UK.


Should content generated by #GenAI hold #copyright? The question seems simple, and to many, the answer is a clear no. But what level and nature of interaction with GenAI tools is sufficient for an author to receive copyright to their work?

In this essay for The Digital Constitutionalist, Zachary Cooper, Volker Stocker, and William Lehr discuss the potential disruptions to creative industries and the threats to international copyright regimes. ➡️ https://digi-con.org/the-new-age-legal-economic-challenges-to-copyright-and-creative-economies-in-the-era-of-generative-ai/
The New Age: Legal & Economic Challenges to Copyright and Creative Economies in the Era of Generative AI.


I suggest you support Standard Ebooks 📚

“Standard Ebooks is a volunteer-driven project that produces new editions of public domain ebooks that are lovingly formatted, open source, free of U.S. copyright restrictions, and free of cost.” ⚖️

See what’s free to read on January 1 👇
https://standardebooks.org/blog/public-domain-day-2025

Please boost 🙏

#StandardEbooks #PublicDomain #PublicDomainDay #Copyright #Ebooks #OpenSource

CC @standardebooks
Ereaders with a Standard Ebook open.


'Moore also pressed legal claims that the record industry had cheated him out of retirement benefits. Moore and other artists sued multiple record companies and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists in 1993.'https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jan/11/soul-man-singer-sam-moore-dies-aged-89-from-surgery-complications
'Moore told the Associated Press in 1994 that he joined the legal effort after learning, despite his million-selling records, that his pension amounted to just $2,285, which he could take as a lump sum or in payments of $73 monthly.'

“Two thousand dollars for my lifetime?” Moore said then. “If you’re making a profit off of me, give me some too. Don’t give me cornbread and tell me it’s biscuits.” #uslaw #music #copyright


"On January 1, 2025, we celebrate published works from 1929 and published sound recordings from 1924 entering the public domain! The passage of these works into the public domain celebrates our shared cultural heritage. The ability to breathe new life into long forgotten works, remix the most popular and enduring works of the time, and to better circulate the oddities we find in thrift stores, attics, and on random pockets of the internet are now freely available for us all.

While not at the same blockbuster level as 2024 with Steamboat Willie’s passage into the public domain, works from 1929 still inhabit strong cultural significance today. The works of 1929 continue to capture the Lost Generation’s voice, the rise of sound film, and the emerging modern moment of the 1920s."

https://blog.archive.org/2025/01/01/welcome-to-the-public-domain-in-2025/

#USA #PD #PublicDomain #Copyright #IP


Conveniently, January 1st will be the next Public Domain Day, with new works entering the public domain, including Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms, more Mickey Mouse animations, Marx Brothers' first feature film, Popeye, Tintin, and the song Singin' in the Rain.

#PublicDomain #PublicDomainDay #copyright

https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2025/


WIRED has mapped all the lawsuits in the US courts over copyright and #AI.

#OpenAI leads the number of cases. The visualisation provides interesting insights.

https://www.wired.com/story/ai-copyright-case-tracker/

#copyright #journalism


It’s critical that copyright be balanced with limitations that support users’ rights, and perhaps no limitation is more important than fair use. Critics, humorists, artists, and activists all must have rights to re-use and re-purpose source material, even when it’s copyrighted.

Yesterday, EFF weighed in on another case that could shape the future of our fair use rights. In Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg, a Los Angeles tattoo artist created a tattoo based on a well-known photograph of Miles Davis taken by photographer Jeffrey Sedlik. A jury found that Von Drachenberg, the tattoo artist, did not infringe the photographer’s copyright because her version was different from the photo; it didn’t meet the legal threshold of “substantially similar.” After the trial, the judge in the case considered other arguments brought by Sedlik after the trial and upheld the jury’s findings.

On appeal, Sedlik has made arguments that, if upheld, could narrow fair use rights for everyone. The appeal brief suggests that only secondary users who make “targeted” use of a copyrighted work have strong fair use defenses, relying on an incorrect reading of the Supreme Court’s decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith."

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/12/eff-tells-appeals-court-keep-copyrights-fair-use-rules-broad-and-flexible

#USA #Copyright #FairUse #IP


#PSA via @kjcharles "UK WRITERS: You need to fill in this consulation. Govt is very clearly looking to an opt-out model of rights licensing that puts all the burden on creators instead of profiteers. It's long and boring but this is important."

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence

#Writers #Authors #Copyright #ArtificialIntelligence #AI

Thread with more details:
https://bsky.app/profile/ednewtonrex.bsky.social/post/3ldjhfestis2s

Please share this information/links, there's not much time.