Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

Suche

Beiträge, die mit CryptoCurrency getaggt sind


Which defines, in your own words, why #bitcoin is a failure @unusual_whales There's NOTHING Alternative about it. Just another 'product' to be gambled on the Schlock Exchange for brokers to skim from. #BTC #Crypto #cryptocurrency


Remember how #Skynet and #Terminators were just fine with a #nuclear devastated world? Hmmm... #BigTech is going all in on #NuclearPower as sustainability concerns around #AI grow

Yahoo Finance
Daniel Howley
October 23, 2024

"#ArtificialIntelligence has driven shares of tech companies like #Microsoft (#MSFT), #Amazon (#AMZN), #Nvidia (N#VDA), and #Google (GOOG, GOOGL) to new highs this year. But the technology, which companies promise will revolutionize our lives, is driving something else just as high as stock prices: #EnergyConsumption [and #WaterConsumption].

"#AI #DataCenters use huge amounts of power and could increase energy demand by as much as 20% over the next decade, according to a Department of Energy spokesperson. Pair that with the continued growth of the broader cloud computing market, and you’ve got an energy squeeze.

"But Big Tech has also set ambitious sustainability goals focused on the use of low-carbon and zero-carbon sources to reduce its impact on climate change. While renewable energy like solar and wind are certainly part of that equation, tech companies need uninterruptible power sources. And for that, they’re leaning into #NuclearPower.

"Tech giants aren’t just planning to hook into existing plants, either. They’re working with energy companies to bring mothballed facilities like Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island back online and looking to build small modular reactors (#SMRs) that take up less space than traditional plants and, the hope is, are cheaper to construct.

"But there are still plenty of questions as to whether these investments in nuclear energy will ever pan out, not to mention how long it will take to build any new reactors."

Read more:
https://www.aol.com/finance/big-tech-going-nuclear-power-201418756.html

#AI #NoNukesForAI #Cryptocurrency #WaterIsLife #NoNukes #RethinkNotRestart #ThreeMileIsland #TheTerminator #JudgmentDay #NuclearPowerNoThanks


Japan’s Self-Help Buzzword Industry Is Not a Real Fount of Wisdom https://www.byteseu.com/559112/ #christmas #CryptoCurrency #InsuranceIndustry #Japan #Liberal #OrganizationOfThePetroleumExportingCountries #Syria #U.S.Democrats #UnitedKingdom #view
Japan's Self-Help Buzzword Industry Is Not a Real Fount of Wisdom


https://www.europesays.com/1672953/ Who were the 2024 election’s “crypto voters”? #crypto #cryptocurrency
Who were the 2024 election's "crypto voters"?


Shady crypto businessmen are already using Trump’s crypto project to funnel money to him, with Justin Sun “investing” $30 million to land an “adviser” role. That should be helpful as he seeks to get out of his various lawsuits and alleged investigations.

#crypto #cryptocurrency #USpol #USpolitics
Justin Sun
Pro tip: If you’re one of the shadiest players in the cryptocurrency industry and want to avoid mainstream press attention on your $30 million bribe to the US president-elect via his cryptocurrency grift, just spend another $6 million on a concept art piece involving a real banana, and eat it.d That stunt will land you no fewer than five New York Times articles (plus a letter to the editor) in the span of eight days, with not a single mention of the Trump contribution.

I will give his backstory as briefly as I can, but I’m afraid it won’t be very brief. In 2017, Chinese citizen and then-resident Justin Sun launched an ICO for his Tron project, raising $70 million days after China banned ICOs, and then fled the country. He bought BitTorrent and tried to turn it into a cryptocurrency company by merging it with Tron, shocking BitTorrent executives who realized that Sun’s “market making” operations were just blatant insider trading. He did another ICO, this time shopping for a lawyer who would agree to write a letter he hoped would shield him from liability if he was later sued by the US SEC (and he was [W3IGG]). He bought the Poloniex cryptocurrency exchange from Circle, after their attempt to turn it from “shitcoin casino numero uno” (as per a former employee) into a legitimate operation failed upon the realization that the lax standards were the whole selling point. Sun promised to return it to its original anything-goes glory, at one point screaming at an employee
Justin Sun has since amassed an even larger collection of companies, many of which he pretends he doesn’t own or control. These include the Huobi exchange (which he rebranded to HTX), BitGlobal, and the TrueUSD stablecoin project. In September 2023, Huobi/HTX was hacked for $8 million [W3IGG]. In October 2023, TrueUSD either lied about having no affiliation with a token called $TEURO, or the TrueUSD deployer was compromised [W3IGG]. In November 2023, Poloniex was hacked for over $120 million [W3IGG]. Less than two weeks later, Huobi/HTX and its Heco Chain project were hacked for $115 million [W3IGG]. In May 2024, Crypto Critics Corner put out an episode presenting a rather convincing argument that Justin Sun is insolvent. They also outlined the incredible shadiness around his companies’ “proofs of reserves”, including the fact that multiple of his companies seem to be counting the same pool of assets as reserves.23

The crypto community distrusts Sun so much that an August announcement that BitGlobal (and thus Sun) would be helping to manage custody for wrapped bitcoin (WBTC) caused a mass exodus from the token. MakerDAO enthusiastically voted to stop accepting WBTC as collateral (before changing their minds after assurance that Sun didn’t have as much influence over WBTC management as they initially thought). Coinbase announced their own wrapped bitcoin product to use instead, and delisted WBTC. Kraken also announced a wrapped bitcoin product.
So all this to say: who better for Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial to bring on as its newest “adviser”? All it took was Sun’s purchase of $30 million worth of WLFI tokens,e which appears to be about as blatant an attempt to get out of the SEC’s crosshairs as the election spending by Coinbase, Ripple, and others. I’ve mentioned WLFI’s disappointing sales in previous issues [I68, 69, 70], and indeed the project had only sold around $20 million worth of the WLFI tokens in total until Sun came along, so the $30 million purchase certainly caught Trump’s attention. World Liberty Financial announced his advisory position in a tweet that described Sun, as is his preference, as merely “an advisor to HTX” and “a supporter of BitTorrent”. It played up his attendance of the University of Pennsylvania, which would've seemed like a bizarre thing to mention if it wasn’t so clear that it was an attempt by WLFI to downplay that Sun is a Chinese national.24

Now, Sun is telling reporters: “In terms of the friendly level [for] the crypto business, I think we could even say the best [jurisdiction] is the U.S.“25 He’s certainly hoping to make it so, especially for his incredibly sketchy brand of “crypto business”.


The Fifth Circuit overturned some sanctions against Tornado Cash, determining that truly immutable smart contracts cannot be sanctioned. I’m not sure this will meaningfully change the effort to sanction the mixer, and it may actually make things worse for blockchain operators.

#crypto #cryptocurrency #TornadoCash
A Fifth Circuit ruling overturned the sanctions against Tornado Cash cryptocurrency mixer smart contracts, imposed by the United States Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in August 2022. The court opined that the smart contracts that comprise the Tornado Cash cryptocurrency tumbler are "not property because they are not capable of being owned", and thus cannot be sanctioned by OFAC.16 The ruling was carefully limited to the specific Tornado Cash smart contracts, which underwent a trusted setup ceremony involving 1,100 participants to make around twenty of the service’s smart contracts permanently immutable.c Unlike many smart contracts, these Tornado Cash contracts truly cannot be modified or controlled in any way (short of, say, changing how Ethereum works), and the court decided that this means they cannot be sanctioned.

This verdict has been celebrated by crypto enthusiasts who felt that OFAC’s sanctions were an overreach, but if it is a victory, I’m not sure it’s a decisive one. For one, I’m not really sure it’s a “crypto” vs. “anti-crypto” fight to begin with, though many in the crypto industry have certainly portrayed it as one. It seems to me that the Fifth Circuit is saying that OFAC can’t sanction a program — that is, the lines of code telling a computer how to perform an action — and that you have to sanction a service that runs that program, or perhaps more precisely: an individual or business that runs a service that runs the program.
But “you can’t sanction this Tornado Cash smart contract” and “you can’t sanction Tornado Cash” are two very different statements, and the Fifth Circuit has said the former, not the latter. I suspect that OFAC will continue to pursue sanctions against Tornado Cash, and the question then becomes how those sanctions are imposed. I think one very real possibility is that OFAC says, “fine, if we can’t sanction the code, we’ll sanction the operators of the computers that run the code” — that is, the relays and validators that accept transactions involving the Tornado Cash service. Already, more than half of blocks added to the Ethereum blockchain are being created with relays that censor transactions involving sanctioned wallet addresses,17 by validators that have taken a cautious approach when it comes to the rather muddy water around blockchain sanctions and who can be prosecuted for violating them. Further development of these legal theories could stand to make it much more challenging, not to mention legally risky, to run an Ethereum validator.

There’s also, of course, the possibility that the Treasury Department will look to Congress to clarify its authority when it comes to smart contracts. While this is certainly a crypto-friendly Congress, I’m not sure if it’s so crypto friendly that it will effectively greenlight sanctions violations so long as they happen via cryptocurrency rails. (But hey, I’ve been wrong before.)


Even as we reflect on Celsius and the massive failures of regulators, politicians are boasting about plans to hobble regulators even further. If they are successful, I fear countless more people will continue to rely on regulators even in their absence, and be ruined because of it.

#crypto #cryptocurrency
While some say that people just have to be on high alert at all times and in every interaction for possible scams, the reality is that most people just don’t expect companies to lie to their faces — particularly US-domiciled companies that they expect to be under the watchful eye of regulators. Most people don’t think twice about whether the bank they’re signing up with is likely to collapse — and many people who encountered Celsius didn’t understand that Celsius was meaningfully different from a bank.

Even as we reflect on Celsius and the massive failures of not just financial regulators, but regulators like the FTC who are meant to prevent deceptive advertising, politicians are boasting about plans to hobble regulators and make them even less effective in fulfilling their mandates. Should they succeed in these plans, perhaps some will react by putting their shields up, adopting the degree of suspicion nearing paranoia that may be required in an every-person-for-themselves world without adequate regulators. More likely, countless more will continue to rely on regulators even in their absence, and be ruined because of it.


As someone who writes a lot about crypto frauds, I see a wide range of reactions to them. One unfortunately common reaction is to blame the victim, dismissing them as crypto degens chasing impossible returns. Reality, as it so often is, is a lot more complicated.

#crypto #cryptocurrency
As someone who writes a lot about crypto frauds, I see a wide range of reactions to them. One unfortunately common reaction is to blame the victim: to say they were greedy for chasing sometimes unbelievably high returns, or that they should have known the risk, or that they somehow had it coming for choosing to put money into crypto. People commonly stereotype those who hold crypto as archetypical “crypto bros”: young, braggadocious trolls trying to get rich quick by being early enough to a pump-and-dump scheme that they can later tell everyone else to “have fun staying poor” from their superyachts. Reality, as it so often is, is a lot more complicated.

Shortly after Celsius declared bankruptcy, Celsius customers began writing letters to the bankruptcy judge, telling their stories and explaining how they came to have money in Celsius, and pleading for him to do everything in his power to return their assets. I was struck by the diversity of the writers: young people to retirees; Americans, Europeans, and people in developing countries; some who started with a ton of money to put into crypto and others who scraped together their portfolios a dollar at a time. Some were financially savvy — the types of people you might expect to have “known better” — others had no idea what they were doing, but were convinced to get into crypto by family or other trusted individuals. Many believed what Celsius and Mashinsky were saying, and that the promises had to be true because US regulato
Mashinsky, who engaged directly with customers via weekly video “ask me anything” sessions and even one-on-one phone calls, was viewed more as a trusted friend or financial adviser by many, who really believed him when he said that he wanted everyone to be able to grow wealthy together using his platform, rather than lose money to banks and other financial institutions that he portrayed as the enemy.

Some recognized and accepted the volatility risk inherent to cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ethereum, but didn’t think there was a risk that the cryptocurrencies they owned might disappear entirely.
Others avoided volatile tokens, instead opting to keep their money in dollars or dollar-denominated stablecoins like USDC. They believed their Celsius account was essentially a (very) high yield savings account, and some even believed that it had the same types of protection — including FDIC depository insurance — as traditional banks.

I am a retired Dutch citizen. Like many others i never thought of transferring all my pension savings as an investment (as Celsius seems to be calling it suddenly after filing for Chapter 11) but from one savings account to another… Also most of us — elderly; risk avoiding depositers — deposited in stable coins because at our age, one can’t speculate on highly volatile assets such as crypto currencies. Many of us — as we are not able to access our savings — can’t now pay for medium or bigger ‘calamities’ in our households, unless that is why we did set aside our savings for.
Others didn’t make assumptions, but instead relied on Mashinsky’s own promises that the company held a $750 million insurance policy for its deposits, and that it didn’t engage in unsecured lending — both of which turned out to be lies. They believed Mashinsky when he said it was impossible for customers to lose their deposits.

Much of my life’s savings are currently held hostage on the Celsius platform. Alex Mashinsky week after week promised the community that our funds were safe and not being used in any risky lending. Every week during his AMA’s he promised that Celsi


Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky entered a plea deal in his criminal fraud and market manipulation trial two months before he was set to face trial.

#crypto #cryptocurrency
The trial was set for late January, and I was curious about how Mashinsky would approach it. Mashinsky is sort of your classic conman, relying on his charisma and ability to talk in circles to pass off his often highly exaggerated pronouncements, if not blatant lies — like claiming to have invented decentralized finance, VoIP, and Uber.3 The combination of mendacity and narcissism reminds me of Sam Bankman-Fried, who remained convinced of his ability to talk his way out of his fraud charges until — and perhaps after — his conviction and sentencing. Their similarities made me wonder if Mashinsky might also take the stand in his own defense.

Mashinsky seems to have proven more willing than Bankman-Fried to listen to the advice of his lawyers, and agreed to this plea deal soon after failing to have two of the charges against him dismissed before trial [I70]. In exchange for a guilty plea to two of the seven charges, commodities fraud and securities fraud, he will forfeit $48 million and face a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison — though he’s likely to get less.


Newsletter: Celsius’ Alex Mashinsky pleads guilty to fraud, some Tornado Cash sanctions are overturned, and tech billionaires complain about “debanking”.

https://www.citationneeded.news/issue-71/

#crypto #cryptocurrency


South Korea Crypto Market Collapses Following President Yoon’s Martial Law Announcement https://www.byteseu.com/527844/ #bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #CryptoCurrency #PresidentYoon #SouthKorea #YoonSukYeol
South Korea Crypto Market Collapses Following President Yoon's Martial Law Announcement


Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky has entered a guilty plea in his criminal fraud trial, which was scheduled to begin in about two months. His Celsius cryptocurrency platform collapsed in July 2022 after it couldn't meet customer withdrawal demands. Its failure was particularly devastating because it had actively marketed itself to customers as safer than banks, regularly telling customers that "banks are not your friends".

#Celsius #crypto #cryptocurrency
Alex Mashinsky wearing a "banks are not your friends" t-shirt onstage at WebSummit 2021


For some reason people fleeing the sinking #Twitter / #X ship for #BlueSky don't seem to be aware of the fact that crypto bros at #BlockchainCapital bought a huge stake in the company just a few weeks ago. Like these are basically the same crypto bros who just helped #ElonMusk buy Twitter. They might even be literally the same people (I strongly suspect they are but I'm too lazy to check). Either way #BlockchainCapital was co-founded by #BrockPierce, who also brought you #Tether, AKA the company that Trump's transition team chairman manages $120 billion for. Pierce is also a friend of the #Netanyahu family.

You don't have to take my word for it. Here's the official press release: https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-24-2024-series-a

Moving to BlueSky is not an escape. Growing a base there is just putting in a bunch of work to create a platform that will be co-opted by crypto bros as soon as X breaks in half.

p.s. crypto bros (#a16z) also own #Substack

#crypto #cryptocurrency #bitcoin #USDT #Trump #DonaldTrump
Bluesky Announces Series A to Grow Network of 13M+ Users
October 24, 2024

by The Bluesky Team

Bluesky now exceeds 13 million users, the AT Protocol developer ecosystem continues to grow, and we’ve shipped highly requested features like direct messages and video. We’re excited to announce that we’ve raised a $15 million Series A financing led by Blockchain Capital with participation from Alumni Ventures, True Ventures, SevenX, Amir Shevat of Darkmode, co-creator of Kubernetes Joe Beda, and others.



О криптовалюте



На сайте «Свободной прессы» вышла статья В. Катасонова о криптовалюте — http://sss.agybvxkyyg.cgxa.fr2.gsr.awhoer.net/economy/article/215645/

В ней мы находим любопытные данные, так автор сообщает:
«Значительная часть всех информационно-коммуникационных технологий реализуется именно в секторе непроизводительных, перераспределяющих услуг. Это, прежде всего, электронный банкинг (ЭБ) и электронная коммерция (ЭК). Это на сегодняшний день основная часть „цифровой экономики“. Но, в конечном счете, целью „цифровизации“ банковского и торгового дела является наращивание прибыли. А прибыль, как известно, и есть проверенный веками инструмент, с помощью которого капиталисты перераспределяют общественный продукт в свою пользу. Прибыль — узаконенное при капитализме обворовывание общества. Ни о каком приумножении „общественного благоденствия“ речи быть не может».

Далее автор указывает, что «цифровая экономика» отнюдь не такое безобидное явление, как это может показаться на первый взгляд. Во-первых, она оттягивает значительное число трудоспособного населения:
«Имеются лишь экспертные оценки по занятости в „цифровом казино“. По всему миру число занятых майнингом уже исчисляется десятками миллионов человек. Пока данный вид деятельности носит в основном „серый“, „теневой“ характер».

Во-вторых, «добыча» (майнинг) виртуальных денег пожирает значительное число энергоресурса:
«О безумно высокой энергоемкости цифрового майнинга уже давно писали и говорили многие эксперты. Для многих индивидуальных „шахтеров“ (те, кто „добывает“ криптовалюту) издержки „добычи“ становятся не подъемными. Они начинают „оптимизировать“ их, занимаясь, например, кражей электроэнергии. Или выводя свои мощности по „добыче“ в страны с более низкими тарифами на электричество. Но магистральным путем стало то, что в учебниках по марксистской политэкономии капитализма называется „концентрацией“ и „монополизацией“ производства и капитала. Происходит объединение индивидуальных „шахтеров“ в „пулы“. В майнинге биткойна сегодня доминирует три крупных пула, на которые приходится 55% всей вычислительной мощности. Фактически в сфере криптовалют происходит стремительная монополизация.

Согласно статистике информационно-аналитического центра Digiconomist, на конец прошлого года энергопотребление сети биткойн в приведении к годовому счислению достигло 35,77 ТВт/ч. Это больше, чем годовое энергопотребление Дании (33 ТВт/ч), Беларуси (33,8 ТВт/ч) или Болгарии (34,9 ТВт/ч). Год назад на биткойн приходилось 0,16% мирового потребления электроэнергии. На конец этого года прогнозируется, что эта доля увеличится до 0,5%. А с учетом того, что имеется множество других криптовалют, „цифровое казино“ в настоящее время может отсасывать до 1 процента всей электроэнергии, генерируемой в мире. Очевидно, что оценки очень приблизительные, прежде всего потому, что часть электроэнергии отсасывается нелегально. Но тенденция очевидна: криптовалютный „паразит“ будет наращивать и в абсолютном, и в относительном выражении масштабы такого энергетического „отсоса“».

«Действительно, — подытоживает автор, — реальная цена, которую человечеству придется заплатить за свои опасные игры под названием „цифровая экономика“, бесконечно высока. „Цифровая экономика“ ведет к разрушению реальной экономики путем паразитического высасывания из нее вполне реальных ресурсов — человеческих, энергетических и финансовых».

Собрав неплохие данные, Катасонов, будучи буржуазно-патриотическим экономистом, делает ложные политические выводы. Смысл позиции автора: долой паразитирование на электрике, идите работать на заводы. Здесь пускается в ход известный трюк с разделением буржуазии на «трудолюбивых производителей» и «спекулянтов-паразитов», разумеется, с целью поддержки первых против вторых.

Пролетариату необходимо избавиться не от каких-то видов или подвидов капиталистов, а от ДИКТАТУРЫ БУРЖУАЗИИ как класса. Цель всякого капиталиста не в удовлетворении потребностей населения, как это пишут в учебниках, а в удовлетворении жажды максимальной прибыли, поэтому если капиталисту выгоднее вложить капитал в «криптоферму», чем в строительство завода, то он организует «криптоферму», и плевать ему на то, какие будут последствия для общества. Проблематика капитализма состоит не в неправильных капиталистах, а в ОБЪЕКТИВНЫХ ЗАКОНАХ экономики, которые порождают ТИРАНИЮ по отношению к пролетариату и народу в целом.

«Майнинг» есть отрасль общественно-бесполезная — типичная отрыжка рыночной экономики, его можно сравнить с рентой, биржевыми спекуляциями или тысячью других закономерных явлений капитализма. Избавление от «паразитических» типов капиталистов (на самом деле ВСЕ они паразиты) является стремлением их конкурентов к большей прибыли, т. е. не отвечает интересам пролетариата.

Однако же политическая опасность «майнинга» состоит в росте и поддержке мелкобуржуазных настроений, что весьма выгодно капиталистическому классу в целом. Чем больше людей верят, что можно выжить без работы на корпорации, тем устойчивее капитализм в целом. Именно поэтому буржуазные государства смотрят на криптоденьги снисходительно, а кое-где даже оказывают поддержку.

Маркс, как известно, называл мелкую буржуазию исчезающей прослойкой, и действительно в рыночных условиях у мелких буржуа одна судьба — пролетаризация, однако они продолжают существовать в основном благодаря «социальной» политике буржуазных государств, которые видят в них социальную опору капитализма.

Кроме того, буржуазные государства слабо регулируют криптовалюты из-за отмывки преступных доходов, а мафия имеет крупное лобби практически во всех буржуазных странах.

Что же касается политики Мадуро по запуску венесуэльской ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ криптовалюты, то это, очевидно, попытка обойти санкции и прижать разнузданный капитализм в финансовой сфере.

#lang-ru #lang_ru #ru
#economy #cryptocurrency